Mineral Resource Estimate

Resource Estimation*

The revised estimate for the Lomonosovskoye Project is based on the same drill database as used in the report prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 -- Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") which was dated December 18, 2012 (and resubmitted on SEDAR on May 9, 2013) (the "December 2012 report"), but with a re-interpretation of the geological and geophysical data and an estimation method that includes an allowance for bulk open-pit or underground mining. This better understanding of the geology and mineralization controls and additional definition provided by down-hole geophysics has allowed an increase in the confidence levels of the estimates.

The new resource estimate is outlined below, above a cut-off grade of 20% Fe:

Mineral Resource Estimate for Combined Lomonosovskoye,
Effective Date of October 31, 2014, Cut-off 20% Fe Class
Class M Tonnes Fe % Fem% P % S %
Measured 66.6 27.57 19.11 0.46 2.66
Indicated 414.2 30.24 20.25 0.19 3.05
Measured & Indicated 507.8 29.89 20.10 0.23 3.00
Inferred 78.1 30.38 20.33 0.08 3.69

Fem% - percentage of magnetic Fe in mineralization

Notes to the Lomonosovskoye Mineral Resource Estimate need to read in conjunction with the table above:

  1. The current resource estimate is based on holes drilled and assays received up to 31 October 2014;
  2. The geological cross sections, completed using historic and 2010-2013 drill holes, geophysical borehole data and local geology models were used to constrain and extend the resource estimation domains up to 50 m beyond the last drill hole, where reasonable;
  3. Three dimensional wireframes were constructed for geological domains in Northwest and Central deposits, using a 10% Fe cut-off grade. Interpretations were guided by 5 m bench composites, down hole magnetic susceptibility data, newly interpreted lithology logs and images of ground magnetic data;
  4. Assay results were composited to 5 meter intervals down-hole within domains;
  5. No grade caps were required for Fe, Fem, P or S
  6. Block Model extents cover the combined Northwest and Central deposits, with a block size of 15mN x 15mE x 10mRL, without sub-blocking to reflect block open-pit or underground;
  7. An Indicator approach was used to select blocks with a greater than 40% probability of being above a cut-off grade of 20% Fe within domains;
  8. Grade was interpolated into a constrained block model using all 5 m sample composites within above or below 20% Fe blocks, including samples with a value below or above 20% Fe respectively. This is considered to represent the true "mining block" grade, including both internal and edge dilution. Ordinary Kriging estimation technique with anisotropy was applied;
  9. Maximum search radius was varied by domain, from 120 m to 400 m with 2 minimum to 42 maximum informing samples;
  10. Density of mineralisation was calculated using the formula: density = 2.9 / (1-0.0061x Fe%) taken from a nonlinear regression coefficient for density against Fe content for over 3000 samples;
  11. Mineral Resources are reported above 20% Fe for both Deposits;
  12. Inferred resource category -- within domain wireframes and with at least 2 informing samples.
  13. Indicated resource category -- within domain wireframes and the maximum of 24 informing samples and Krig Slope greater than 0.1.
  14. Measured resource category -- within domain wireframes and the maximum of 24 informing samples and a Krig Slope > 0.5.

* Extracts from Independent Technical Report on the Lomonosovskoye Iron Project, Republic of Kazakhstan revised on October 31, 2014 by Qualified Person, Andrew Vigar of Mining Associates.

 

Contact Us

Room 630, 6th Floor,
Arman Business Center
6 Saryarka Avenue
Astana, Kazakhstan, 010000
Tel: +011 7 717 279 03 95
Email: